Thursday, October 30, 2008

Obama a genius? Where is the proof?

Misopalinism [Victor Davis Hanson]
I remain convinced that the continuing furor over (as opposed to disagreement with) Palin still originates in large part from class, cultural, and geographical disdain. So I am struck how often criticism of Palin could be more than equally applied to both Obama and Biden—but rarely is. I would be curious to collate Mrs. Palin's undergraduate transcript with that of Mr. Obama's, but learn that would be impossible since for some unknown reason the latter at Columbia is under lock and key. No comment on Mr. Biden's, since long ago we learned that the senator is not factual in his recall of matters academic.Anti-intellectual and anti-enlightenment? Anyone who collates the rantings of Rev. Wright, the 20-year erstwhile spiritual advisor to Mr. Obama (whom 'I could no more disown than ....' ) would find discourses on crackpot anti-black middle-classness, strange new bombs primed to hunt down blacks and Arabs, and something called black liberation theology that is on an intellectual par with phrenology. If one were to review the lunatic groups that received money from the Chicago Anneberg Challenge or the Woods Fund, one could infer that neither logic nor facts weighed into Obama's decision-making.
Scholarship? I know of no legal scholarly papers published by Obama, either as an editor at Harvard Law Review or a lecturer at the Chicago Law School; what little op-ed commentary he has written (cf. his post 9/11 essay) is on par with Michelle Obama's Princeton thesis. His memoirs are well crafted, but their content is ignored since it offers a logical explanation for everyone from Wright to Ayers, and everything from redistribution to racialism.
Both Obama's and Biden's historical recall is at times frightening (e.g., We liberated Auschwitz; the largely Anglo-American Berlin Airflift was a world effort; FDR went on TV as President in 1929; Hezbollah is out of Lebanon; etc.).
Their popular notion of science often turns puerile (checking for proper tire pressure substitutes for the energy captured by tapping into billions of barrels in reserves of new oil; we are not to burn coal—when it currently supplies half the power for our electrical generation and we sit atop the world's largest coal reserves, etc.). If we turn to math, we learn there are either 57 or 47 states, and J-O-B-S is a three-letter word.
And while Ms. Palin is donating her clothes to charity, I am not sure that Team Obama can do the same with the now discarded multimillion-dollar faux-Greek columns and pediments or the now obsolete vero possumus seal.
I have no problem with admitting (thankfully) that Palin is no Adlai Stevenson, but why do others apparently assume that Obama or Biden is?

Khalidi Palestine Liberation Org. leader a problem.

Many people don't understand or comprehend why Rashid Khalidi is a problem relationship for Obama. They just think it is one more big deal. They just ignore the fact that all these relationships add up to a very Marxist leaning/lying US Presidential Candidate. Obama's language is 'telling'. Why should YOU care? Obama, again, lies and says Israel is to be protected while supporting groups that denounce Israel and are Anti-Semitic. Here is an example:
"I kind of raised my eyebrows last February when Obama went on his glib little diatribe against "an unwavering pro-Likud approach to Israel." That kind of language is very particular and very revelatory. Likud Prime Ministers are the ones who made peace with Egypt, handed over Hebron to Arafat, and handed over Gaza to the Palestinians. So someone who's just studying Middle East history would never naturally end up using "pro-Likud" as a synonym for "intransigent Zionist right winger." Dozens of one-sided lectures and conversations are necessary before that kind of rhetoric seems quotidian.
There is one specific community that talks like that all the time - where "pro-Likud" actually means "pro-Israel" and both are supposed to be derisive. That would be the radical, Israel-hating academic community that was so well-represented at Khalidi's celebration. And why wouldn't their best and brightest be there? Khalidi himself was a master at that kind of rhetoric:

The dominant neoconservative elements in the administration were already predisposed to accept a hard-line Likud analysis... these necon "Sharonistas" in official and unofficial Washington has long espoused extremist Likud views...[this] line of thinking was shared by the Bush administration's ascendant neocons and the new Likud government
Khalidi has also been known to express his vicious, batshit crazy conspiracy theories in the same charming language: "for these American Likudniks and their Israeli counterparts, sad to say, the tragedy of September 11 was a godsend."

Aaron Klein is also pretty convinced that Obama picked up his "Israel is a constant sore" line from Khalidi:

Continue reading "So That's Where Obama Learned To Talk Like An Obsessed Anti-Semitic Academic" » (from mererhetoric......

Wednesday, October 29, 2008

More Obama fraud

Just how much fraud is too much fraud in the Obama campaign before the Obamatized masses wake up and take note? Voter fraud, campaign contribution fraud, media fraud, personal association fraud, personal history fraud...the list just grows and grows...but the Obamatized masses just go gleefully forward to our doom....Oh I am sure the Daily craphole Kos has a 'reasonable' explanation for this too. yeah, right.

"Fully $100 million of the record-breaking $150 million that the Obama campaign collected in September alone came over the internet via credit card donations. The Obama campaign has deliberately turned off the anti-fraud mechanisms available for internet credit card transactions. They have no clue how many millions or tens of millions of dollars have been donated to them in violation of federal election law. And now it turns out that the Obama campaign cheerfully takes even contributions from untraceable pre-paid credit cards, a/k/a "the pseudo-credit cards you use when you want to conceal illegal activity."

Did he ever show up to work on time?????

Obama, Not ready to Michelle obama

Obama says friends were 'carefully chosen'.

""To avoid being mistaken for a sellout, I chose my friends carefully," the Democratic presidential candidate wrote in his memoir, "Dreams From My Father." "The more politically active black students. The foreign students. The Chicanos. The Marxist professors and structural feminists."

Yes, friends DO matter.....he even admits it. So why don't people get it???

Tuesday, October 28, 2008

A sign of the future?

After spending nine years in Navy Intelligence as … After spending nine years in Navy Intelligence as a Cryptologist, intercepting communications from Marxist/Socialist countries, breaking their codes, and gathering intelligence in “other” ways. I am familiar with their methods of using the media for propaganda, using the educational system to indoctrinate young minds, using the judicial system, and voter fraud to steal elections. This is what is happening now in America. From everything I have researched in the last two years, has lead me to conclude that Obama was selected, tutored, groomed, scripted, and financed by Radical Marxist/Socialists to become the puppet leader of the USSA. There is a vast difference between Social Democrats and Radical Marxist/Socialists. Hillary Clinton is a Social Democrat. Obama, Pelosi, Reid, Dodd, Schumer, Durbin, Franks, Boxer, and a few others now in Congress are Radical Marxist/Socialists.
On my website: [] I have a 16 minute video of an interview with Yure Bezmenov a KGB agent who defected in 1970. This interview was recorded 24 years ago, and the transcript highlights, in Yuri’s own words confirm what I mentioned in the first paragraph. I pray that I am wrong, but from everything I have researched, I believe Obama, with a Reid Pelosi led Congress, with a radical judicial system will pull a Hugo Chavez.

In a recent address to his subjects, carried by fiat on all of the nation’s television channels, Venezuela’s authoritarian president Hugo Chávez Frias, who has previously taken over the airways for the celebration of his own birthday, now turned his country’s attention to more urgent matters. The time had come, he explained, to move the “Bolivarian revolution” from its Lenin-like beginnings of transitional capitalism towards a more robust command economy. The nation had at last “broken the chains of the old, exploitative capitalist system,” he said. “The state now has the obligation to build the model of a socialist economy.”
The next stage of the socialist revolution will require making thirty-three separate amendments to the Venezuelan constitution—a document Chávez previously rewrote upon his ascension to Miraflores Palace in 1999. The most dramatic and controversial change will eliminate presidential term limits, ensuring the fulfillment of Chavez’s promise not to leave office until 2021. To Hugo Chávez, a permanent revolution requires that he wield permanent power. It’s a risky move, considering recent opinion polls showing a majority of Venezuelans skeptical to further constitutional “reform,” especially if it means the possibility of adopting a President Chávez for life. But the same public, polling data demonstrates, also opposed the government’s refusal to renew a broadcast license for RCTV, the country’s oldest and most anti-Chávez private television network, and that storm seems to have passed. (radarsite)

Monday, October 27, 2008

Obama and marxism

The 2nd College Edition of the American Heritage Dictionary defines Marxism as "a system of thought that gives class struggle a primary role in leading society from bourgeois democracy under capitalism to a socialist society and from there to communism." Sound like any Presidential candidate you know? Is it mere coinsidence that both class struggle and avoiding "middle classness" as Rev. Wright and Michelle tell audiences are main tenets of black liberation theology?

Obama doesn't believe that the Supreme Court has done enought to 'redefine' the Constitution. HUH????

Friends and records do they matter?

As with most people, many of the people closest to you, shape you into what you become as an adult. Take a look at the partial list of people that Obama has been influenced by…

Father - Communist activist
Mother - Communist symphasizer
Brother(Roy) - Luo activist, militant muslim, marxist
Bill Ayers - American terrorist, marxist
Bernadine Dohrn - Wife of Bill, American terrorist, marxist
Rev. Wright - Racist, anti-american, marxist
Louis Farrakhan - Racist, anti-semite, marxist
ACORN - Socialist organization, voter fraud
Democratic Socialists of America - Socialist organization
Endorsed by Communist Party USA
Endorsed by Chicago Young Communists Leauge
Endorsed by Marxists/Communists/Socialists for Obama
Endorsed by Hamas terrorist group
Michelle Obama - Marxist, race baiter, Public Allies director

1. Occidental College records — Not released
2. Columbia College records — Not released
3. Columbia Thesis paper — ‘not available’
4. Harvard College records — Not released
5. Selective Service Registration — Not released
6. Illinois State Senate schedule — ‘not available’
7. Law practice client list — Not released
8. Certified Copy of original Birth certificate — Not released
9. Embossed, signed paper Certification of Live Birth — Not released
10. Harvard Law Review articles published — None
11. University of Chicago scholarly articles — None
12. His Record of baptism– Not released or ‘not available’
13. His Illinois State Senate records–’not available’

Put it all together and what do I see? I see a man that has lived a part of his adult life as a Revolutionary, wanting nothing less than to see the American way of life dissolved forever. I see a man that see’s everything through his Spiritual and Political education, and from what we know about both, Obama is scary.

Friday, October 24, 2008

Obama No Merci Beaucoup!

Great song!


My, my, it a shame (snicker)....Certainly wouldn't be because it is a liberal, hack, rag these days...."Moody’s Investors Service said on Thursday it may cut its ratings on New York Times Co into junk territory, citing concerns about continuing revenue declines and risks associated with refinancing its debt.

The New York Times posted a quarterly loss from continuing operations on Thursday and said advertising revenue at its news media group dropped 16 percent for the quarter." Story continues: boo hooooo hoo

Michael Goldfarb smacks the NYT, "“Just after the New York Times ended months of intense speculation by announcing its endorsement of Barack Obama, the company’s corporate credit rating was lowered to ‘junk’ status — an appropriate reflection of the paper’s editorial judgment as well as the quality of its reporting.”

The real crisis we face now

Obama endorse marxist New Party candidate "We share the same values"

Barack Obama started his political career in 1996 in the living room of a domestic terrorist.
Obama began his career as a member of the quasi-Marxist New Party.

Obama is the most liberal member of the US Senate let alone the most radical candidate to ever run for President of the United States.
This man is no moderate.

By the way-- The New Party, ACORN and Project Vote shared the same address in Chicago.

Note: He doesn't sound 'controlled, presidential, or smooth' here. He sounds ANGRY. hmmm.

The real Obama

Barack Obama denies and conceals his liberalism and packages himself as a harbinger of hope and change.

Obama's policies represent change all right: change from almost everything our Founding Fathers considered sacred and vital to the preservation of individual liberty in America.

As for Obama's leftist policy positions and attitudes, how do you think the following would sit with most Americans?
His enabling of infanticide by arguing and voting against the Induced Birth Infant Liability Act in the Illinois Senate, which would have protected babies who survive failed abortions.

His support of open borders and driver's licenses for illegal immigrants.

His casual endorsement of Marxist redistribution of wealth.

His plan to let the Bush tax cuts expire, resulting in a massive tax increase for tens of millions, and his tax credits to tens of millions more not paying income taxes, all while fibbing that he's going to cut income taxes for 95 percent of Americans.

His plans to increase spending an estimated $1.3 trillion, not to mention the obscene dollars he would send overseas with the Global Poverty Act.

His condemnation of our liberation of Iraq from the brutal dictator Saddam Hussein in furtherance of our national security interests yet promising military interventions for humanitarian reasons where we clearly have no national interests at stake.

His opposition to the surge in Iraq and his plan to withdraw and jeopardize our imminent victory and the region's stability.

His reckless plan to embroil us in a quagmire in Afghanistan and agitate Pakistan, our important ally in the war on terror.

His naive commitment to negotiate with tyrants without preconditions.

His inclination toward unilateral nuclear disarmament.

His constant references to America's former greatness and his promises to restore our position of respectfulness in the world, betraying his full agreement that we've earned this supposed international disrespect.

His forfeiture of American sovereignty to international bodies in obeisance to the pantheistic religion of global warming.

His Kerryesque schizophrenia on guns and the Second Amendment.

His derision of small-town Americans as bitter clingers.

His thuggish approach toward those who dare to oppose him, such as Joe the Plumber, or anyone in St. Louis, whose criticism could have subjected them to criminal prosecution.

His outright mocking of the Bible while adamantly insisting he's a strong Christian: "Which passages of Scripture should guide our public policy? Should we go with Leviticus, which suggests slavery is OK and that eating shellfish is abomination? How about Deuteronomy, which suggests stoning your child if he strays from the faith? Or should we just stick to the Sermon on the Mount — a passage that is so radical that it's doubtful that our own Defense Department would survive its application?" By David Limbaugh

Thursday, October 23, 2008

Economists: Obama's tax plan will ruin the economy..and the tax code as well

Economist: Obama's Socialism Will Wreck the Economy
It'll Ruin the Tax Code as Well

Posted by: Brian Faughnan

Economist Adam Lerrick asks whether the tax code is at a tipping point, and if Barack Obama will shove it over the edge:

What happens when the voter in the exact middle of the earnings spectrum receives more in benefits from Washington than he pays in taxes? Economists Allan Meltzer and Scott Richard posed this question 27 years ago. We may soon enough know the answer.

....Barack Obama couches all of his talk in the language of 'fairness;' of trying to make sure that everyone gets 'a slice of the pie.' But in employing the rhetoric of redistribution, class warfare, and yes, socialism, Obama ignores how progressive the tax code already is. It's often said that when you rob Peter to pay Paul, you can always count on Paul's support. In trying to push the fairness needle further, Obama is attempting to lock that rule in as a foundation of tax policy.

As the Tax Foundation points out, the tax code already redistributes $1 trillion from the top 40 percent of earners to the lowest 60 percent. How much is enough for President Obama? And what happens if we discover, as France, Germany, the U.K., and much of Europe did, that you will destroy the economy and ruin government finances if you allow the bottom half of earners to vote themselves whatever benefits they want, at the expense of the minority.

The TRUTH about Bill Ayers and YOU

What did (does) the Weather Underground/Bill Ayers/radical fringe group have in store for YOU? 1982 documentary "No Place to Hide"...a CIA operative infiltrated group.

Wednesday, October 22, 2008

Does it matter to YOU?

Let's play "Does it matter to you?".....
*Does it matter that Louis Farrahkan, the leader of the Black Muslim movement (he believes at promotes the idea that ALL white people come from the Devil) said this of Obama..."You are the instruments that God is going to use to bring about universal change and that is why Barack has captured the youth and he has involved young people in a political process that they didn't care anything about. That's a sign. When the Messiah speaks, the youth will hear, and the Messiah is absolutely speaking.
*Does it matter that Hollywood actor, Sean Penn, met with Venezuelan Dicatator and self-avowed America hater, Hugo Chavez for the 2nd time?
*Does it matter that black actor Harry Belafonte used to call Gen. Colin Powell a 'House Slave' and now respects him because he endorsed the most liberal Senator EVER?
*Does it matter that a law is being put into effect mandating a donation to ACORN, the corrupt political organization endorsed and legal respresented by Obama?
*Does it matter that Democrats in control of congress for 2 years have ruined the economy, benefited financially from Fannie and Freddie, are not being investigated and they are now saying they are going to 'go after a lot of rich people' for tax money and they want MORE?
*Does it matter that the movie "W" by Oliver Stone that lambasts Bush (no matter what you think of him) is fully funded by CHINA? CHINA???
*Does it matter that you can no longer say 'socialist', 'community organizer', 'welfare' or 'welfare recipient' because that is 'code language' for BLACK and therefore 'racist'?
*Does it matter that Gov. Sarah Palin, a woman, has been vilified, ridiculed, mocked, trashed, investigated, and even a porn movie has been made about a VP candidate and yet you can't ask ANY legitimate questions about and to Obama without being labeled 'racist, personally investigated, or sued?
*Does it matter that the Women's Movement has set ITSELF back hundreds of years becasue of self-loathing and self-hatred? That is the only explanation for the reason sane and intelligent women would not protest the hate, porn, violent acts and stories written about a woman with legitimate political aspirations? They did the same to Hillary Clinton...shame on women!

more 'does it matter' later...............

Small business and Obama---Kiss the American Dream Good-bye

Obama will bankrupt small business. As a small business owner I can personally say that Obama's tax plan will ruin the American Dream for millions of Americans. The Wall Street Journal writes:
"Mr. Obama's tax increase would hit the bottom line of small businesses in three direct ways. First, because 85% of small business owners are taxed at the personal income tax rate, any moderately successful business with an income above as little as $165,000 a year could face a higher tax liability. That's the income level at which the 33% income tax bracket now phases in for individuals, and Mr. Obama would raise that tax rate for those businesses to 36%.
Second, the Obama plan phases out tax deductions (the so-called PEP and Pease provisions), thus raising tax rates imposed on this group by another 1.5 percentage points. Finally, Mr. Obama would require many small business owners to pay as much as a four-percentage-point payroll tax surcharge on net income above $250,000. All of this would bring the federal marginal small business tax rate up to nearly 45%, while big business would continue to pay the 35% corporate tax rate.

You have been warned

Make no mistake...your taxes WILL be raised. The creators of the financial mess will get your money and get to spend it their way.

Tuesday, October 21, 2008

Important decision to make...where do YOU stand?

We either patriotically turn the country over to a man who has proudly served his nation in war time and peace — or we face electing a man who has a checkered past, a man who has counted domestic terrorists among his friends, and a man who spent 15 years in a church where his pastor regularly damned and condemned the United States.

Barack Obama is not simply a risky choice as our next president — He is a dangerous one.

Meanwhile, Obama’s life remains a laundry list of dirty secrets!

▪ Two weeks before the election, Obama refuses to offer documentation of legal citizenship, NO official birth certificate produced yet!

▪ Obama pokes fun, but still refuses to explain his Arab Muslim school records

▪ Obama’s ACORN Voter Fraud is under FBI investigation for federal crimes

▪ Now Obama is investigating the FBI investigation of ACORN – putting investigators on trial to defend known ACORN voter fraud

▪ Obama still refuses to unseal his college records

▪ Obama refuses to truthfully disclose Ayers and many other radical relationships

▪ Illegal Foreign money is still flooding into Obama campaign, unchecked!

▪ Obama “Senator Government” still lying about economic – tax plan

▪ Obama won’t explain why Saudi Royalty front-man, Dr. Khalid Al Mansour was grooming him through college

▪ Arab world campaign contributions 'may enable him to win U.S. presidency'

▪ Obama joined Libya's Gadhafi among top contributors to Kenya communist thug and Obama cousin, Odinga

The list of Obama secrets goes on and on and on... That’s part of the problem. There are so many evil Obama associations and the effort to conceal them all has been so massive, that there are not enough hours left to investigate it all before the election.

We know more than we should about Joe the Plumber, who just asked a question, when Obama drove through his neighborhood. The media has 'vetted' Joe, but a no go on the big O.

Powell endorsement of Obama racially motivated

Pseudo-republican Gen. Colin Powell finally made the announcement everyone knew was coming. He endorsed B. Hussein Obama for President. This comes as no surprise to many. The Left and Gen. Powell say this is NOT racially motivated, yet, why would a purported Republican 4 Star General who was one of the major supporters of the Iraq War and who adamantly claimed there were WMD's, now support an ineffectual, inexperienced radical socialist BLACK candidate (but he looks good and he's smooth, right?)who opposed the surge if it were not for race?

The arguments for why he wouldn't be racially motivated do not hold water and Obama hates the polls closing the gap. Obama held Powell as his 'ace in the hole' endorsement for the end of the election to 'seal the deal'. It you think it isn't about race then you are just drinking the Kook-aid. Race has been the only word used consistently by the Obama campaign.

The problem is no one cares. Powell is just another BLACK person casting a vote for the BLACK candidate. Powell secures a cabinet position with Obama, Obama can say he 'crossed the aisle' with this pseudo-republican general, and black people everywhere cheer wildly as Obama is quickly tested in an INTERNATIONAL CRISIS within 6 months of his election. One in which Joe Biden says Obama's supporters will NOT be happy about. Hmmm......just another day in OZ

Biden predicts crisis

Tax truth

It is amazing how Marxisant radical Barack Obama gets away with campaigning on how he will give a tax break to 95% of Americans when his record shows that he has voted for tax increases 300 times as a state senator and 94 times as a US Senator.
But, he's not alone.
Most Democrats believe in "spreading the wealth around."

Dem Leader Barney Frank of Fannie Mae fame announced yesterday that "there should be tax increases" and that "there are plenty of rich people we could tax."

Monday, October 20, 2008

Michelle Obama and Saul Alinskey

Here's a test. Who said or wrote the following quotes and when?

Person 1: "What follows is for those who want to change the world from what it is to what they believe it should be.
The Prince was written by Machiavelli for the Haves on how to hold power. Rules for Radicals is written for the Have-Nots on how to take it away."
Person 1: _______________________

When: _________________________

Person 2: "Barack stood up that day and spoke words that have stayed with me ever since. He talked about the world as it is and the world as it should be. And he said that all too often we accept the distance between the two and settle for the world as it is, even when it doesn't reflect our values and aspirations. But he reminded us that we know what our world should look like. We know what fairness and justice and opportunity look like. And he urged us to believe in ourselves, to find the strength within ourselves to strive for the world as it should be.
[ . . . ] All of us driven by a simple belief that the world as it is just won't do. That we have an obligation to fight for the world as it should be. That is the thread that connects our hearts. That is the thread that runs through my journey and Barack's journey and so many other improbable journeys that have brought us here tonight, where the current of history meets this new tide of hope."

Person 2: _______________________

When: _________________________

Person 1: Sol Alinsky, "Rules for Radicals," 1972

Person 2: Michelle Obama, Democrat National Convention, 2008

JFK on character

26 years ago today:

“I believe the old Emersonian advice that what you are speaks far louder than what you say is the best possible advice in judging a political campaign.”

–John F. Kennedy
October 19, 1962

Think about it!

Obama PRO abortion act 1st act as President

Obama has forcefully vowed that his very first act as President would be to sign the Freedom of Choice Act (FOCA). FOCA claims a "fundamental right" to abortion throughout all nine months of pregnancy, and no government body at any level would be able to "deny or interfere with" this right. Even the pro-choice NOW readily acknowledges that FOCA would literally "sweep away hundreds of anti-abortion laws [and] policies."

Obama has a 0% rating from the National Right to Life Committee and 100% rating from NARAL Pro-Choice America.

Biden predicts 'manufacturered international crisis' for Obama

"Mark my words," the Democratic vice presidential nominee warned at the second of his two Seattle fundraisers Sunday. "It will not be six months before the world tests Barack Obama like they did John Kennedy. The world is looking. We're about to elect a brilliant 47-year-old senator president of the United States of America. Remember I said it standing here if you don't remember anything else I said. Watch, we're gonna have an international crisis, a generated crisis, to test the mettle of this guy."

"I can give you at least four or five scenarios from where it might originate," Biden said to Emerald City supporters, mentioning the Middle East and Russia as possibilities.

Great.....a disaster is inevitable and Obama will be at the helm.....we're sunk.

Friday, October 17, 2008

Obama a Brand

From Dr. Lynette Long, democrat and former Clinton supporter: "Obama is a brand just like any other brand. Obama the Brand has a logo, a tag line, t-shirts, and a song. But Obama the man is not the same as Obama the Brand. Obama the Brand talks about new style politics, while Obama the man used Chicago style politics in every one of his elections. Obama the brand is for women’s rights while Obama the man marginalizes women and his supporters wear Sarah Palin is a cunt t-shirts. Obama the brand is pro-Israel, Obama the man is not. Obama the brand touts leadership while Obama the man voted present 130 times in the US Senate. Obama the Brand claims change, while Obama the man picks a Washington insider as his running mate. Obama the Brand loves America, but many of Obama the man’s associates hate America. Obama the Brand is a post-racial candidate while Obama the man plays the race card at every turn, listened for 20 years to the racial teachings of Rev. Wright, and makes contributions exclusively to Trinity United Church of Christ, the NAACP and Care Africa. Obama the man and Obama the Brand are not one in the same. If elected Obama the man will make the decisions, not Obama the Brand." from New Mexico speech this weekend


If you wonder what an Obama Presidency would be like then all you need to do is look at the tactics run in this campaign. Obama 'truth' squads squashing free speech and the right to disagree, massive multi-state voter FRAUD and stealing this election, privacy attacks on Governor Palin and now the ordinary citizen asking a simple question...Joe the Plumber. If the media spent the time it has in looking into every detail of Obama's life like they did Joe the Plumber then Hilary would be a sure in for President now. Obama was never vetted as vigourously as Palin OR Joe the Plumber. We still don't have Obama's school records, ACTUAL birth certificate, why he has plagarized speeches of candidates from 4 years ago, his iffy personal connections, and the list could go on.....Everything Obama is hands-off....everything about YOU the citizen is fair game.......THAT is does not bode well for the future of this country.

No free speech, no right to question the anointed one, no right to dissent, stuffing the ballot box, wanting only the media that likes the anointed one (Obama boohoos every chance he gets about Fox news while NYT, WP, MSNBC, CBS, ABC,CNN, etc are ALL in the tank for him)...we might as well live in Russia....

People ignore the obvious. It isn't about is about what Obama SAID...and what he said is that his plan is MARXISM...pure and simple. yep, Obama is RED

Thursday, October 16, 2008

Obama plagarizes speechesof others

Obama's Acorn connection from his website

pulled this off Obama’s own website:

When Obama met with ACORN leaders in November, he reminded them of his history with ACORN and his beginnings in Illinois as a Project Vote organizer, a nonprofit focused on voter rights and education. Senator Obama said, “I come out of a grassroots organizing background. That’s what I did for three and half years before I went to law school. That’s the reason I moved to Chicago was to organize. So this is something that I know personally, the work you do, the importance of it. I’ve been fighting alongside ACORN on issues you care about my entire career. Even before I was an elected official, when I ran Project Vote voter registration drive in Illinois, ACORN was smack dab in the middle of it, and we appreciate your work.”

Even the liberal Obama owned " responded after the debate:

He did, but that wasn't his only involvement. He also worked closely with ACORN's Chicago office when he ran a Project Vote registration drive after law school, and Obama did some leadership training for Chicago ACORN. The Woods Fund, where Obama served as a board member, gave grants to ACORN's Chicago branch; both organizations are concerned with disadvantaged populations in that city. And during the primaries of this election, Obama's campaign paid upwards of $800,000 to the ACORN-affiliated Campaign Services Inc. for get-out-the-vote efforts (not voter registration). Those services were initially misrepresented on the campaign's Federal Election Commission reports, an error that some find suspicious and others say is par for the course. ACORN's Chicago office and CSI have not been under investigation."

another debate LIE exposed and so easy to google duh!

Freedom of speech is DEAD DEAD DEAD

It is appalling to consider the state of our country. The liberal media has lost its mind, not to mention any sense of dignity. Joe 'the plumber' did the unthinkable. He asked the almighty anointed Obama a legitimate question and now he is being vilified and dissected in the media. The offensive Daily Kos (a slimebag liberal rag) has gone as far as printing Joe's address, phone number, and other PERSONAL AND PRIVATE information on its website. Other rags, including the NYT, has stepped over the line and done the same.

When did Freedom of speech die in this country? The day the LEFT decided to anoint Obama for President. Every freedom we have in this country is being yanked from us in the blink of an eye. No one can disagree with the Anointed One. No one can print, speak, question the Anointed One without fear of reprisal.

This should scare anyone thinking that Obama will be for change of HOPE in this country. Change for sure, but not change you will want. All of our personal rights will be gone. What is being done to Joe the Plumber is a travesty.

We now know more about Joe the Plumber than we do about the Anointed One. Obama has REFUSED to submitt an authentic birth certificate. He has REFUSED to release ANY school records. We know only what he wants us to know and the answers change almost daily. Every bit of his past has been carefully orchestrated and every relationship has been reduced to a political soundbite. No truth....just carefully rehearsed rhetoric....

He blatantly LIED during the debate. Amazing since his lies are easily a matter of public record. The truth is that Obama does not know the truth. His preacher said it best. This politician will say and do anything to get elected. Even if that means tearing down the very people he professes to care about. Don't be fooled. Obama is in it for HIM. Your taxes WILL be raised to pay for those free abortions and welfare gifts to the those who filed to vote 73 times. Your income will be distributed to those who are the ultimate slaves....those on the dole. Free speech, free press, free market society is dead......I don't even think it will rest in peace. I know that I won't......

conservative swings....except in the USA

While the USA seems on the brink of electing the MOST LIBERAL SENATOR EVER...most of our leading allies have taken a conservative swing in recent elections...Canada being the most recent.
"Mark Steyn put it earlier this week:

If Obama is elected in November, at G7 meetings, for the first time since they began, America will have a more left-wing leader than any other member of the group - Canada, Germany, France, Italy, Japan, and Britain (and that’s before Gordon Brown loses to David Cameron). Right-of-center government throughout the western world - except Washington.

Obama PRO-abortionist....not just pro-choice

I can't state this better than this author can so here is the article:

"Obama's Abortion Extremism
by Robert George
October 14, 2008
Sen. Barack Obama's views on life issues ranging from abortion to embryonic stem cell research mark him as not merely a pro-choice politician, but rather as the most extreme pro-abortion candidate to have ever run on a major party ticket.

Barack Obama is the most extreme pro-abortion candidate ever to seek the office of President of the United States. He is the most extreme pro-abortion member of the United States Senate. Indeed, he is the most extreme pro-abortion legislator ever to serve in either house of the United States Congress.

Yet there are Catholics and Evangelicals-even self-identified pro-life Catholics and Evangelicals - who aggressively promote Obama's candidacy and even declare him the preferred candidate from the pro-life point of view.

What is going on here?

I have examined the arguments advanced by Obama's self-identified pro-life supporters, and they are spectacularly weak. It is nearly unfathomable to me that those advancing them can honestly believe what they are saying. But before proving my claims about Obama's abortion extremism, let me explain why I have described Obama as ''pro-abortion'' rather than ''pro-choice.''

According to the standard argument for the distinction between these labels, nobody is pro-abortion. Everybody would prefer a world without abortions. After all, what woman would deliberately get pregnant just to have an abortion? But given the world as it is, sometimes women find themselves with unplanned pregnancies at times in their lives when having a baby would present significant problems for them. So even if abortion is not medically required, it should be permitted, made as widely available as possible and, when necessary, paid for with taxpayers' money.

The defect in this argument can easily be brought into focus if we shift to the moral question that vexed an earlier generation of Americans: slavery. Many people at the time of the American founding would have preferred a world without slavery but nonetheless opposed abolition. Such people - Thomas Jefferson was one - reasoned that, given the world as it was, with slavery woven into the fabric of society just as it had often been throughout history, the economic consequences of abolition for society as a whole and for owners of plantations and other businesses that relied on slave labor would be dire. Many people who argued in this way were not monsters but honest and sincere, albeit profoundly mistaken. Some (though not Jefferson) showed their personal opposition to slavery by declining to own slaves themselves or freeing slaves whom they had purchased or inherited. They certainly didn't think anyone should be forced to own slaves. Still, they maintained that slavery should remain a legally permitted option and be given constitutional protection.

Would we describe such people, not as pro-slavery, but as ''pro-choice''? Of course we would not. It wouldn't matter to us that they were ''personally opposed'' to slavery, or that they wished that slavery were ''unnecessary,'' or that they wouldn't dream of forcing anyone to own slaves. We would hoot at the faux sophistication of a placard that said ''Against slavery? Don't own one.'' We would observe that the fundamental divide is between people who believe that law and public power should permit slavery, and those who think that owning slaves is an unjust choice that should be prohibited.

Just for the sake of argument, though, let us assume that there could be a morally meaningful distinction between being ''pro-abortion'' and being ''pro-choice.'' Who would qualify for the latter description? Barack Obama certainly would not. For, unlike his running mate Joe Biden, Obama does not think that abortion is a purely private choice that public authority should refrain from getting involved in. Now, Senator Biden is hardly pro-life. He believes that the killing of the unborn should be legally permitted and relatively unencumbered. But unlike Obama, at least Biden has sometimes opposed using taxpayer dollars to fund abortion, thereby leaving Americans free to choose not to implicate themselves in it. If we stretch things to create a meaningful category called ''pro-choice,'' then Biden might be a plausible candidate for the label; at least on occasions when he respects your choice or mine not to facilitate deliberate feticide.

The same cannot be said for Barack Obama. For starters, he supports legislation that would repeal the Hyde Amendment, which protects pro-life citizens from having to pay for abortions that are not necessary to save the life of the mother and are not the result of rape or incest. The abortion industry laments that this longstanding federal law, according to the pro-abortion group NARAL, ''forces about half the women who would otherwise have abortions to carry unintended pregnancies to term and bear children against their wishes instead.'' In other words, a whole lot of people who are alive today would have been exterminated in utero were it not for the Hyde Amendment. Obama has promised to reverse the situation so that abortions that the industry complains are not happening (because the federal government is not subsidizing them) would happen. That is why people who profit from abortion love Obama even more than they do his running mate.

But this barely scratches the surface of Obama's extremism. He has promised that ''the first thing I'd do as President is sign the Freedom of Choice Act'' (known as FOCA). This proposed legislation would create a federally guaranteed ''fundamental right'' to abortion through all nine months of pregnancy, including, as Cardinal Justin Rigali of Philadelphia has noted in a statement condemning the proposed Act, ''a right to abort a fully developed child in the final weeks for undefined 'health' reasons.'' In essence, FOCA would abolish virtually every existing state and federal limitation on abortion, including parental consent and notification laws for minors, state and federal funding restrictions on abortion, and conscience protections for pro-life citizens working in the health-care industry-protections against being forced to participate in the practice of abortion or else lose their jobs. The pro-abortion National Organization for Women has proclaimed with approval that FOCA would ''sweep away hundreds of anti-abortion laws [and] policies.''

It gets worse. Obama, unlike even many ''pro-choice'' legislators, opposed the ban on partial-birth abortions when he served in the Illinois legislature and condemned the Supreme Court decision that upheld legislation banning this heinous practice. He has referred to a baby conceived inadvertently by a young woman as a ''punishment'' that she should not endure. He has stated that women's equality requires access to abortion on demand. Appallingly, he wishes to strip federal funding from pro-life crisis pregnancy centers that provide alternatives to abortion for pregnant women in need. There is certainly nothing ''pro-choice'' about that.

But it gets even worse. Senator Obama, despite the urging of pro-life members of his own party, has not endorsed or offered support for the Pregnant Women Support Act, the signature bill of Democrats for Life, meant to reduce abortions by providing assistance for women facing crisis pregnancies. In fact, Obama has opposed key provisions of the Act, including providing coverage of unborn children in the State Children's Health Insurance Program (S-CHIP), and informed consent for women about the effects of abortion and the gestational age of their child. This legislation would not make a single abortion illegal. It simply seeks to make it easier for pregnant women to make the choice not to abort their babies. Here is a concrete test of whether Obama is ''pro-choice'' rather than pro-abortion. He flunked. Even Senator Edward Kennedy voted to include coverage of unborn children in S-CHIP. But Barack Obama stood resolutely with the most stalwart abortion advocates in opposing it.

It gets worse yet. In an act of breathtaking injustice which the Obama campaign lied about until critics produced documentary proof of what he had done, as an Illinois state senator Obama opposed legislation to protect children who are born alive, either as a result of an abortionist's unsuccessful effort to kill them in the womb, or by the deliberate delivery of the baby prior to viability. This legislation would not have banned any abortions. Indeed, it included a specific provision ensuring that it did not affect abortion laws. (This is one of the points Obama and his campaign lied about until they were caught.) The federal version of the bill passed unanimously in the United States Senate, winning the support of such ardent advocates of legal abortion as John Kerry and Barbara Boxer. But Barack Obama opposed it and worked to defeat it. For him, a child marked for abortion gets no protection-even ordinary medical or comfort care-even if she is born alive and entirely separated from her mother. So Obama has favored protecting what is literally a form of infanticide.

You may be thinking, it can't get worse than that. But it does.

For several years, Americans have been debating the use for biomedical research of embryos produced by in vitro fertilization (originally for reproductive purposes) but now left in a frozen condition in cryopreservation units. President Bush has restricted the use of federal funds for stem-cell research of the type that makes use of these embryos and destroys them in the process. I support the President's restriction, but some legislators with excellent pro-life records, including John McCain, argue that the use of federal money should be permitted where the embryos are going to be discarded or die anyway as the result of the parents' decision. Senator Obama, too, wants to lift the restriction.

But Obama would not stop there. He has co-sponsored a bill-strongly opposed by McCain-that would authorize the large-scale industrial production of human embryos for use in biomedical research in which they would be killed. In fact, the bill Obama co-sponsored would effectively require the killing of human beings in the embryonic stage that were produced by cloning. It would make it a federal crime for a woman to save an embryo by agreeing to have the tiny developing human being implanted in her womb so that he or she could be brought to term. This ''clone and kill'' bill would, if enacted, bring something to America that has heretofore existed only in China-the equivalent of legally mandated abortion. In an audacious act of deceit, Obama and his co-sponsors misleadingly call this an anti-cloning bill. But it is nothing of the kind. What it bans is not cloning, but allowing the embryonic children produced by cloning to survive.

Can it get still worse? Yes.

Decent people of every persuasion hold out the increasingly realistic hope of resolving the moral issue surrounding embryonic stem-cell research by developing methods to produce the exact equivalent of embryonic stem cells without using (or producing) embryos. But when a bill was introduced in the United States Senate to put a modest amount of federal money into research to develop these methods, Barack Obama was one of the few senators who opposed it. From any rational vantage point, this is unconscionable. Why would someone not wish to find a method of producing the pluripotent cells scientists want that all Americans could enthusiastically endorse? Why create and kill human embryos when there are alternatives that do not require the taking of nascent human lives? It is as if Obama is opposed to stem-cell research unless it involves killing human embryos.

This ultimate manifestation of Obama's extremism brings us back to the puzzle of his pro-life Catholic and Evangelical apologists.

They typically do not deny the facts I have reported. They could not; each one is a matter of public record. But despite Obama's injustices against the most vulnerable human beings, and despite the extraordinary support he receives from the industry that profits from killing the unborn (which should be a good indicator of where he stands), some Obama supporters insist that he is the better candidate from the pro-life point of view.

They say that his economic and social policies would so diminish the demand for abortion that the overall number would actually go down-despite the federal subsidizing of abortion and the elimination of hundreds of pro-life laws. The way to save lots of unborn babies, they say, is to vote for the pro-abortion-oops! ''pro-choice''-candidate. They tell us not to worry that Obama opposes the Hyde Amendment, the Mexico City Policy (against funding abortion abroad), parental consent and notification laws, conscience protections, and the funding of alternatives to embryo-destructive research. They ask us to look past his support for Roe v. Wade, the Freedom of Choice Act, partial-birth abortion, and human cloning and embryo-killing. An Obama presidency, they insist, means less killing of the unborn.

This is delusional.

We know that the federal and state pro-life laws and policies that Obama has promised to sweep away (and that John McCain would protect) save thousands of lives every year. Studies conducted by Professor Michael New and other social scientists have removed any doubt. Often enough, the abortion lobby itself confirms the truth of what these scholars have determined. Tom McClusky has observed that Planned Parenthood's own statistics show that in each of the seven states that have FOCA-type legislation on the books, ''abortion rates have increased while the national rate has decreased.'' In Maryland, where a bill similar to the one favored by Obama was enacted in 1991, he notes that ''abortion rates have increased by 8 percent while the overall national abortion rate decreased by 9 percent.'' No one is really surprised. After all, the message clearly conveyed by policies such as those Obama favors is that abortion is a legitimate solution to the problem of unwanted pregnancies - so clearly legitimate that taxpayers should be forced to pay for it.

But for a moment let's suppose, against all the evidence, that Obama's proposals would reduce the number of abortions, even while subsidizing the killing with taxpayer dollars. Even so, many more unborn human beings would likely be killed under Obama than under McCain. A Congress controlled by strong Democratic majorities under Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi would enact the bill authorizing the mass industrial production of human embryos by cloning for research in which they are killed. As president, Obama would sign it. The number of tiny humans created and killed under this legislation (assuming that an efficient human cloning technique is soon perfected) could dwarf the number of lives saved as a result of the reduced demand for abortion-even if we take a delusionally optimistic view of what that number would be.

Barack Obama and John McCain differ on many important issues about which reasonable people of goodwill, including pro-life Americans of every faith, disagree: how best to fight international terrorism, how to restore economic growth and prosperity, how to distribute the tax burden and reduce poverty, etc.

But on abortion and the industrial creation of embryos for destructive research, there is a profound difference of moral principle, not just prudence. These questions reveal the character and judgment of each man. Barack Obama is deeply committed to the belief that members of an entire class of human beings have no rights that others must respect. Across the spectrum of pro-life concerns for the unborn, he would deny these small and vulnerable members of the human family the basic protection of the laws. Over the next four to eight years, as many as five or even six U.S. Supreme Court justices could retire. Obama enthusiastically supports Roe v. Wade and would appoint judges who would protect that morally and constitutionally disastrous decision and even expand its scope. Indeed, in an interview in Glamour magazine, he made it clear that he would apply a litmus test for Supreme Court nominations: jurists who do not support Roe will not be considered for appointment by Obama. John McCain, by contrast, opposes Roe and would appoint judges likely to overturn it. This would not make abortion illegal, but it would return the issue to the forums of democratic deliberation, where pro-life Americans could engage in a fair debate to persuade fellow citizens that killing the unborn is no way to address the problems of pregnant women in need.

What kind of America do we want our beloved nation to be? Barack Obama's America is one in which being human just isn't enough to warrant care and protection. It is an America where the unborn may legitimately be killed without legal restriction, even by the grisly practice of partial-birth abortion. It is an America where a baby who survives abortion is not even entitled to comfort care as she dies on a stainless steel table or in a soiled linen bin. It is a nation in which some members of the human family are regarded as inferior and others superior in fundamental dignity and rights. In Obama's America, public policy would make a mockery of the great constitutional principle of the equal protection of the law. In perhaps the most telling comment made by any candidate in either party in this election year, Senator Obama, when asked by Rick Warren when a baby gets human rights, replied: ''that question is above my pay grade.'' It was a profoundly disingenuous answer: For even at a state senator's pay grade, Obama presumed to answer that question with blind certainty. His unspoken answer then, as now, is chilling: human beings have no rights until infancy - and if they are unwanted survivors of attempted abortions, not even then.

In the end, the efforts of Obama's apologists to depict their man as the true pro-life candidate that Catholics and Evangelicals may and even should vote for, doesn't even amount to a nice try. Voting for the most extreme pro-abortion political candidate in American history is not the way to save unborn babies.

Sunday, October 12, 2008

Why won't he give the documents?

All OBAMA has to do is provide one simple document. So, what's the problem? Why hire a lawyer for the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR), a named co-conspirator in the case against the Holyland Foundation, to throw up roadblocks?

Obama in Kenya--acknowledged as Kenyan citizen in video

Pay special attention to 4:18 in the video, where they edit in a clip of a young woman saying that Barack is a Kenyan. Given that Barack has specifically denied this, I find it interesting that it was left in the video.

Don't cry for me Argentina

The ANGRY LEFT will hate this

Tuesday, October 7, 2008

Obama's Radical Pastor and Radical church

B. Hussein Obama would like you to think he went to this church for 20 YEARS and NEVER heard Rev. Wright talk this way...yeah, I have a bridge to nowhere for you!

Barack Obama also wrote that: "Black Nationalism- “a steady attack on the white race”-is justified if it can deliver results

Monday, October 6, 2008


Michelle Obama a BIG WHINER

Surprise that Michelle Obama's former boss said she was a big complainer and nothing he ever gave her to do satisfied her. Why does it surprise me when this is a woman that lived 44 years as an American and it took her that long to find something to be proud of in her country....when B. Hussein was nominated......Quincy White headed the recruitment firm that Michelle Obama worked for. He notes that "she at one point went over my head and complained [to human resources] that I wasn’t giving her enough interesting stuff, and the person came down to my office and said, ‘Basically she’s complaining that she’s being treated like she’s a second-year associate,’ and we agreed that she was a second-year associate. I had eight or nine other associates, and I couldn’t start treating one of them a lot better....“I couldn’t give her something that would meet her sense of ambition to change the world."

Now THIS kind of woman gives other women a bad name. She goes to work with a firm as a 2nd year associate and wants the brass ring the moment she gets there BEFORE and AHEAD of other equally or better qualified employees. She is demanding, whiny, complains, and has what we call an insubordinate attitude that would get others fired or reprimanded...but not Grand DAME DEMANDS her due. UGGG....what an obnoxious, self-absorb and offensive woman...SHE sets women back....I guess we could call her 'uppity'. (snort..oh, but that would be 'racist')

THIS makes ME want to scream OY!

Know your friends...Know YOU

Obama's friends:

Barack Obama never set any bombs. But he’s never had problems with associating with those who did.

William Ayers-terrorist
Jeremiah Wright-racist preacher of hate
Louis Farrahkan-Wright associate, black muslim racist hatemonger
Penny Pritzker, Obama's National Finance Chair and a long time supporter.
The Pritzker Family co-owned the Superior Bank FSB, which collapsed in 2001, resulting in a $460 million payment to federal regulators. Penny served as head of the Board from 1991-1994 and is a director of the bank's holding company, Coast to Coast Financial Corp.
Rezco-convicted Syrian with ties to terrorists

They hardly knew each other.......

From an "Intellectual" Conference in Chicago, 2002.... "create a more engaged civil society, working towards social change, fostering coalitions between theorists and activists, and combating anti-intellectualism in contemporary culture."

2:15-3:45 p.m.IV.
Intellectuals in Times of CrisisExperiences and applications of intellectual work in urgent situations.
William Ayers
, UIC, College of Education; author of Fugitive Days
Douglass Cassel, Northwestern University, Center for International Human Rights
Cathy Cohen, University of Chicago, Political Science
Salim Muwakkil, Chicago Tribune; In These Times
Barack Obama, Illinois State Senator
Barbara Ransby, UIC, African-American Studies (moderator)

UPDATE: another event......"Ayers, who spent a year observing the Cook County Temporary Juvenile Detention Center in Chicago, is one of four panelists who will speak on juvenile justice at 6 p.m. Thursday, Nov. 20, in the C-Shop. Ayers will be joined by Sen. Barack Obama, Senior Lecturer in the Law School, who is working to combat legislation that would put more juvenile offenders into the adult system;Michelle Obama, Associate Dean of Student Services and Director of the University Community Service Center, hopes bringing issues like this to campus will open a dialogue between members of the University community and the broader community."

More and more events where they were 'more than neighbors'........LIAR

Sunday, October 5, 2008

Sweet 16

Sweet sixteen and never been kissed.
Remember this number.
Only 16% of the members of the Senate are women.
Only 16% of the members of the House of Representatives are women.
Only 16% of the Governors are women.
Only 16% of equity law partners are women.
Only 16% of the science professors at MIT are women.
Isn't it time for real change.
It's time for more women to be in government.

Another feminist leaves the Democratic Party

From No Quarter: Dr. Lynette Long shares why she is voting McCain/Palin...finally a diehard feminist that GETS IT....the Democratic Party is NOT for women....."The Democratic Party is not our ally. The Democratic Party is 60% women but it has only once selected a woman as a vice-presidential candidate and that was nearly a quarter of a century ago. We are chattel in our own party. The head of the Democratic National Committee has never been a woman. Money donated to the Women’s Leadership Fund is funneled into the Obama Victory Fund. We cannot give dominion over our bodies or ourselves to one party. Current feminist groups have no teeth because they are part and parcel of the Democratic Party. They are held hostage by Roe v. Wade. They know it and the Democratic Party knows it. The only way to regain our power is to regain our vote. The Democratic Party has no reason to earn our vote. We’ve sacrificed one choice for another.
I will by not be held hostage by the Democratic Party that turned a blind eye to the corruption in the Democratic primaries and Democratic caucuses.
I will not be held hostage by the Democratic Party that ignored a woman who got 18 million votes.
I will not be held hostage by the Democratic Party a party that was deaf, dumb and blind to the persistent and pervasive sexist attacks against Hillary Clinton.
I will not be held hostage by a Democratic Party that has never had a female head of the DNC.
I will not be threatened into submission. I will not cast my vote based on fear.
The Democratic Party cannot be rewarded for its pervasive disrespect of women. Sometimes you have to break a few eggs to make an omelet. Sometimes you have to tear down a house before you can rebuild it. Most feminists think the Democratic Party will treat them differently during the next election. There is no next time. There is only this time. Reinforcing abuse only perpetuates abuse. In any abusive relationship, you have to leave to get respect. Abusers are often charming and apologetic and hold out the hope of better behavior. But there is no then, there is only now.
I am a woman and I am a feminist. To the other feminists out there I ask, “Where is your pride or are you a victim of your own misogyny?”
I am a woman and right now I am ashamed to say, I am a feminist.
Visit my blog: Dr. Lynette Long. Also visit my Caucus Fraud analysis site.

Lack of character and they matter?

Certainly, this country has never seen as Far Left a ticket at Obama-Biden ticket.
Never has America seen a presidential candidate with such inexperience.
Never has there been a presidential candidate with such poor judgement.
On his one major vote in the US Senate on the surge in Iraq Barack Obama was wrong.

The Judicial Network released this ad earlier in the week focusing on the Obama's record of choosing America-haters, anti-Semites, slum lords, and terrorists into his close circle of friends:

Thursday, October 2, 2008

Hilary praises Palin!

Sen. Clinton had this to say about Gov. Palin's debate: "It's amazing, you know, she's been thrust into the national spotlight with very little preparation and I think that, all things considered, you saw a very composed and effective debater last night."

Governor Palin proved she could handle herself in a Presidential and competent manner tonight. As Michelle Malkin notes, "She was warm, fresh, funny, confident, energetic, personable, relentless, and on message. She roasted Obama’s flip-flops on the surge and tea-with-dictators declarations, dinged Biden’s bash-Bush rhetoric, challenged the blame-America defeatism of the Left, and exuded the sunny optimism that energized the base in the first place.

"Her performance underscored the underhandedness of the hatchet job editors at ABC News and CBS News, which failed to capture her solid competence on the whole array of foreign and domestic policy issues on the debate table tonight."

The pundits, liberals, and others will go crazy tomorrow with "Palin Derangement Syndrome", but that isn't anything new......

Article from American Thinker author Dunn: "Sarah Palin is the only one with any of the requisite executive experience required for office. She is the sole candidate who has ever run anything larger than a college debating society. If she is not qualified, none of them are, and we'd better dump 'em all and start over...........Only two senators have been elected president in this century: Warren G. Harding and John F. Kennedy. (Johnson, Bush, Sr., and Truman all served as VPs before entering the Oval Office.).......Americans like governors -- somebody with hands-on experience at running a state who can demonstrate that experience. McKinley, Wilson, Coolidge, FDR, Reagan, Clinton, and George W. were all successful governors before becoming president. ........The differences between running a town, a state, and a country are matters of degree, not of essence. The same skills and abilities are required in each foreign policy experience????......except for the easily demonstrated fact that Governor Palin, on August 27th of this year, completed a pipeline agreement with Canada, which is a foreign country. The agreement had been stymied for over two decades by various interests in Alaskan state government. Palin got it wrapped up in that busy eighteen months.

Frats stomp for Obama "Alpha/Omega"

How are YOU it all!!!

Cult of Personality YOU should be VERY AFRAID


LOU DOBBS: A presidential election now 35 days away. Election fraud still posing a dangerous threat to this democracy. Perhaps even worsening. Early voting began today in Ohio

"Has everybody lost their minds? There's no way for these volunteers to check that. I mean it's an absurdity."

PILGRIM: Yeah, the officials we spoke to today say the county boards are just overwhelmed with the volume that they have to do at this point. It's such a big election.

DOBBS: Well, it is a big election, important election, but apparently no one cares about that
Only Lou Dodd and Glenn Beck of CNN have reported on this. Other liberal media sources have been silent. This is another 'audacious' example of Obama this his kind of 'change'?